Proposals go wrong at the question, not the writing: too broad to answer in the time, or with a method chosen before the question was settled. This narrows the question first, reads just enough to show the gap, and puts a rough draft in front of a supervisor weeks before it is due.
Free on any plan. You will see this list again in the app, and nothing is created until you press install.
Narrow enough to finish, with a method chosen to fit it.
The part proposals actually go wrong at.
A rough draft early, so there is time to change it.
Title Research question Why it matters What is already known, and the gap Method, and why it fits the question Feasibility: time, access, budget, ethics Timeline References
The question and the method are what gets judged. Everything else is there to support them.
Chapters as milestones, writing as a routine, and a supervisor who sees drafts early.
Find the question, read enough to know it is a real one, and set up how you work.
Search, read, and synthesise as three separate jobs, with a stopping rule.
The case, the budget and the paperwork, all working back from a deadline that does not move.
It takes one press. Everything it creates is tagged, so if it turns out not to suit you, it is easy to find and remove together.
Install this template