Literature reviews sprawl because searching feels productive and never finishes. This makes the search a bounded project with its own deadline, and treats synthesis as writing rather than as something that happens once enough has been read.
Free on any plan. You will see this list again in the app, and nothing is created until you press install.
Organised by claim, not by paper, and finished on a date.
Bounded, because searching feels productive and never ends.
Written as I go, grouped by claim rather than by source.
A per-paper pile is easy to build and very hard to write from. Grouping by the claims being made means the structure of the review emerges from the notes instead of being imposed at the end.\n\nThe stopping rule matters more than it looks. New sources stop changing the shape of the argument a while before that feels true.
Chapters as milestones, writing as a routine, and a supervisor who sees drafts early.
Find the question, read enough to know it is a real one, and set up how you work.
The case, the budget and the paperwork, all working back from a deadline that does not move.
A goal with a date, a plan to get there, and the routines that do the actual work.
It takes one press. Everything it creates is tagged, so if it turns out not to suit you, it is easy to find and remove together.
Install this template