A review cycle is judged on whether the feedback surprises anybody. This spreads the evidence gathering across the period rather than the fortnight before, and makes the writing start early enough that calibration is not a rush.
Free on any plan. You will see this list again in the app, and nothing is created until you press install.
Evidence gathered across the period, not recalled at the end.
The whole point. Recall is biased to the last month.
Early enough that calibration is not a rush.
If something in a review surprises somebody, the failure happened months earlier in the one-to-ones. The review is only where it became visible.\n\nGeneral praise and general criticism are equally unactionable, and both are what gets written when the evidence was not collected as it happened.
Your first quarter managing: the people first, the work second, and one thing delivered.
Write down what the role is before you look, so everyone is judging the same thing.
The first month planned before they arrive, so day one is not spent finding a laptop.
Decide what each meeting is for, then keep only the ones with an answer.
It takes one press. Everything it creates is tagged, so if it turns out not to suit you, it is easy to find and remove together.
Install this template