✦
Experiments

Goal rouletteYou cannot choose.
So don't.

Some decisions are worth deliberating over. Choosing which of six roughly equivalent personal goals to do first is not one of them, and the deliberation has probably already cost more than picking the worst one would have. Three months of not choosing is three months of not doing any of them, which is strictly worse than three months on your fourth-favourite.

Free, no sign-up. Worked out in your browser, nothing sent anywhere, and the result imports into EvyOS.

Put in at least two goals. Roulette with one option is just a goal.

Everything is worked out in this page and saved in this browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Share this
✦ How to use it

Three things that make it work.

1
Only put in goals you would genuinely accept

This is the one rule. Do not include one you would refuse — you will refuse it, and then it was all theatre.

2
Do not refresh

The same input gives the same answer on purpose. Re-rolling is just deciding with extra steps.

3
Thirty days

Long enough for a real result, short enough that committing costs little. Reconsider after, not during.

So this picks. Not randomly in the useless sense — the choice is derived from what you typed, so the same six goals always produce the same answer, and refreshing will not give you a different one. That is deliberate. A machine you can re-roll is a machine that lets you keep deciding.

Thirty days, then you may reconsider. The commitment is the mechanism, not the picking.

✦ The limit

An answer is not a record.

This works something out and then forgets it. It cannot tell you whether the number moved, because it has no memory of the last time you ran it and no idea what you did in between. Every calculator on the internet has that limit, and if it has never bothered you then this one is yours for free for good.

EvyOS is the same structure with the work recorded against it. Send the result across and it becomes real goals, tasks or habits with their dates — then the next answer is computed from what actually happened rather than from what you remember typing.

Start free →Everything else
✦ Questions

Goal roulette, answered.

For six roughly equivalent personal goals, no. The cost of continuing to deliberate is larger than the difference between them, and the evidence that you have been deliberating for months is that you are reading this. Thirty days on your fourth-favourite beats another quarter of none of them.
The answer is derived from what you typed, so refreshing gives the same result. That is on purpose — a re-rollable machine is just deciding with extra steps, and deciding is the thing that was not working.
Then you have learned which one you actually wanted, which is a legitimate result and arguably the best one. Do that one instead, immediately, and stop deliberating.
Long enough to produce a real result and short enough that agreeing to it costs almost nothing. The commitment is the mechanism here; the picking is only what makes committing possible.
Reconsider properly, with a month of evidence you did not have before. Most people either continue or discover the goal was never as appealing as it was while it remained hypothetical.

Keep the answer.
And the record of doing it.

Goals, projects, tasks, habits and skills in one system, with the work logged against what it belonged to.

Start for free →